The abstinence violation effect is characterized by two key cognitive affective elements. Cognitive dissonance (conflict and guilt) and personal attribution effect (blaming self as cause for relapse). Individuals who experience an intense AVE go through a motivation crisis that affects their commitment to abstinence goals30,31. Relapse is seen as transitional process and not an endpoint or an outcome failure. The lapse process consists of a series of internal and external events, identified and analyzed in the process of therapy.
What Is Cognitive Dissonance Theory?
At the start of treatment, Rajiv was not keen engage to in the process of recovery, having failed at multiple attempts over the years (motivation to change, influence of past learning experiences with abstinence). Cognitive dissonance is the discomfort you feel when you have cognitive dissonance addiction two contradictory beliefs or values. Examples of cognitive dissonance include a smoker who knows cigarettes are dangerous, a company that doesn’t follow its own code of ethics, or a person who avoids speaking about a past trauma while still dealing with it in the present.
Type D personality and smartphone addiction
- The results show that self-efficacy plays a negative role in regulating the impact of cognitive dissonance on discontinuous usage intentions, which is important for the design and development of pan-entertainment mobile live broadcast platforms.
- Addressing cognitive dissonance in the recovery process requires addiction specialists to have a deep understanding of their clients’ conflicting beliefs and emotions.
- Additionally, the study found that self-efficacy negatively regulates the effect of cognitive dissonance and the impact of information overload, service overload, and user addiction on cognitive dissonance.
We benefit, though, from approaching these inconsistencies with curiosity and grace, even when we want to change them. Instead of feeling defensive, dig into the information that your response gives you. Understanding what caused the dissonance can help you figure out the best way to address it.
Too much alone together. The risk factors for social isolation
An alcoholic might tell themselves, “I only drink on weekends, so I don’t have a problem,” even as they secretly sneak drinks throughout the week. A gambler might rationalize, “I’m due for a big win any day now,” despite mounting debts https://ecosoberhouse.com/ and broken promises. A person with cognitive dissonance experiences mental conflict and may take steps to try to resolve it. This could include changes in behavior or attempts to ignore information that contradicts a goal or desire.
- The affective part of the framework refers to how individuals feel about the pan-entertainment mobile live broadcast platform.
- The Smartphone Addiction Scale Short Version (SAS-SV; [81]), was utilized to measure problematic smartphone use.
- By training the AI model on the user’s mobile device and transferring only information about the parameters obtained from the training back to a global model, Federated Learning can significantly improve user privacy compared to traditional machine learning approaches.
- In the context of addiction, cognitive dissonance occurs when someone wants to continue using drugs or alcohol, but also desires to recover.
Cognitive behavioural interventions in addictive disorders
In addition to these emotional experiences, cognitive dissonance can also inspire a change in your behavior or beliefs. Some of these changes can be positive, such as shifting problematic beliefs or harmful habits. Cognitive dissonance is a theory in social psychology first proposed by Leon Festinger. According to this theory, cognitive dissonance describes the discomfort experienced when two cognitions are incompatible with each other.
Individuals with Type D personality exhibit avoidant behaviors when it comes to social interaction [19]. If they do not have access to a smartphone, they may feel a lack of connection to social support and social interaction, which in turn exacerbates their anxiety about being without a mobile phone. To allay their anxiety, they may become more dependent on and use their smartphones, ultimately leading to the development of smartphone addiction.
The interaction of person–affect–cognition–execution (I-PACE) model can be used to explain the relationship between Type D personality and smartphone addiction. The I-PACE model is a theoretical framework for the processes underlying the development and maintenance of an addictive use of certain Internet applications or sites promoting gaming, gambling, pornography viewing, shopping, or communication [30]. First, according to the I-PACE model, personality traits are important factors in the development of addictive behaviors [31]. Thus, as an important personality type, the relationship between Type D personality and addictive behavior cannot be overlooked. According to the self-regulation theory, people maintain or restore psychological balance in a wide variety of ways [32], and people who have more negative emotions have a greater need for self-regulation [33].
Dangers of Cognitive Dissonance for Substance Abusers
According to the cognitive escape theory, some people tend to escape from reality when confronted with challenging and stressful situations [87]. Individuals with Type D personality, who often experience negative emotions, are more likely to divert their attention to smartphone use and become addicted to smartphones. In addition to the above aspects, existing studies have explored the relationship between personality and metacognitions about smartphone use. According to the personality typology theory, different people may exhibit different personality types [67, 68].
Leave a Reply